2015.10.16 16:46
CAA Produce Report Based Upon Apparently Inaccurate Details.
조회 수 5 추천 수 0 댓글 0
Getting payment was a battle of wits, but after a court judgment this week airlines' excuses are running out. After being rescheduled onto a later flight which too was postponed by 90 minutes, we finally came to Orlando at 1 clock in the early morning, about 5 hours and 15 minutes later than our initial scheduled time. We finally got to Heathrow over 20 hours later than arranged with our flight from Miami to Heathrow (rearranged through British Airways) likewise delayed by 23 minutes. As a result of the delay getting back, we sustained extra expenses for food and extra airport parking charges. You are proper that as American Airlines is not an EU based airline you can just consider EU261 rules for the external air travel.
My air travel to Edinburgh by means of London from Rome with BA in September was postponed over 12 hours. I have actually written to BA to request payment for the hold-up under the EU guidelines and received a letter from them today declining the claim stating that the aircraft was harmed by a foreign object during the preceding flight and this is outside our control and makes up as remarkable situations.". The pilot on the eventual air travel from Rome to London revealed that there had been a catalogue of issues that caused the total delay. So my concern is can BA escape liability when the initial aircraft was not the only factor in the legend?
I have actually read regulation 261/2004, and it says that if a flight is delayed 5 hours or more, the traveler is entitled to leave the journey and get a full compensation". As long as you notified the company at the time that you were taking yourself off the air travel and you did this after five hours then you ought to have the ability to assert a refund for the expense of the air travels.
This flight was cancelled and actual time of rescheduled departure was 18.05 hrs (regional Indian time - 12.35 hrs GMT 04/02/2013) getting to approx 23.59 hrs GMT 04/02/2013 showing up 17hrs 15 minutes later on after initial scheduled time. We were informed the air travel was postponed due to the landing lights not working and the back up system also failing'. After several hours of tannoy announcements stating the air travel was postponed we were then notified at approx 06.30 (local time) that the air travel was cancelled. Unless you desire these make it clear in your letter to them that you want cash according to EU261 guidelines and NOT vouchers.
I would suggest calling Norwegian Airlines again to ask them more information about your hold-up and why they are classifying it as amazing circumstances - and keep records of your correspondence with the airline company in case you need to refer back to it at a later date. Then you would have been entitled to compensation subject to pleasing the conditions, if this had been a Thomson aircraft. Unfortunately you would not be entitled to compensation under EU261 rul; es in this instance. The only strategy you might now have is to whine direct to KLM/Delta (they are partner airline companies)and ask for payment for the disruption.
I had return air travels just reserved with them to Turkey last year and was delayed more than 4 hours on the outgoing air travel. The hold-up was due to the door of the plane being harmed by a loose piece of cargo hitting it. Thomas Cook have stated that this falls into amazing scenarios - is this proper? Anything within the control of the airline company (which would consist of freight loading onto the airplane) ought to be thought about for a compensation payment for the delay. Hi, we flew January 9th 2015 with Emirates from London heathrow to Dhaka through Dubai.
Hoping you can help me with my flight delay on 02-09-14 from Dalaman Airport to Manchester Airport with the set up departure time of 22:25. As a person who isn't really a confident a positive air travel passenger last thing you need eu delayed flight compensation to see. An air travel showed up 7 hours lat, Jet 2 are stating under amazing conditions (NeBs) and payment is omitted under the EU regulations.
My air travel to Edinburgh by means of London from Rome with BA in September was postponed over 12 hours. I have actually written to BA to request payment for the hold-up under the EU guidelines and received a letter from them today declining the claim stating that the aircraft was harmed by a foreign object during the preceding flight and this is outside our control and makes up as remarkable situations.". The pilot on the eventual air travel from Rome to London revealed that there had been a catalogue of issues that caused the total delay. So my concern is can BA escape liability when the initial aircraft was not the only factor in the legend?
I have actually read regulation 261/2004, and it says that if a flight is delayed 5 hours or more, the traveler is entitled to leave the journey and get a full compensation". As long as you notified the company at the time that you were taking yourself off the air travel and you did this after five hours then you ought to have the ability to assert a refund for the expense of the air travels.
This flight was cancelled and actual time of rescheduled departure was 18.05 hrs (regional Indian time - 12.35 hrs GMT 04/02/2013) getting to approx 23.59 hrs GMT 04/02/2013 showing up 17hrs 15 minutes later on after initial scheduled time. We were informed the air travel was postponed due to the landing lights not working and the back up system also failing'. After several hours of tannoy announcements stating the air travel was postponed we were then notified at approx 06.30 (local time) that the air travel was cancelled. Unless you desire these make it clear in your letter to them that you want cash according to EU261 guidelines and NOT vouchers.
I would suggest calling Norwegian Airlines again to ask them more information about your hold-up and why they are classifying it as amazing circumstances - and keep records of your correspondence with the airline company in case you need to refer back to it at a later date. Then you would have been entitled to compensation subject to pleasing the conditions, if this had been a Thomson aircraft. Unfortunately you would not be entitled to compensation under EU261 rul; es in this instance. The only strategy you might now have is to whine direct to KLM/Delta (they are partner airline companies)and ask for payment for the disruption.
I had return air travels just reserved with them to Turkey last year and was delayed more than 4 hours on the outgoing air travel. The hold-up was due to the door of the plane being harmed by a loose piece of cargo hitting it. Thomas Cook have stated that this falls into amazing scenarios - is this proper? Anything within the control of the airline company (which would consist of freight loading onto the airplane) ought to be thought about for a compensation payment for the delay. Hi, we flew January 9th 2015 with Emirates from London heathrow to Dhaka through Dubai.
Hoping you can help me with my flight delay on 02-09-14 from Dalaman Airport to Manchester Airport with the set up departure time of 22:25. As a person who isn't really a confident a positive air travel passenger last thing you need eu delayed flight compensation to see. An air travel showed up 7 hours lat, Jet 2 are stating under amazing conditions (NeBs) and payment is omitted under the EU regulations.