2015.10.16 07:50
Ways To Assert EU Flight Delay Payment.
조회 수 15 추천 수 0 댓글 0
Travelers whose air travel is heavily delayed or cancelled can payment under European law. Payment is likewise per person, so for a family of four, quadruple it (although where a traveler takes a trip totally free of charge - a child, for example - you can not assert). BUT compensation is based in euros, indicating the amount you'll get in sterling will change, depending on the currency exchange rate at the time the payment is made. But you don't need to allow these, you're entitled to your payment in money (likely to be paid by cheque). Sarah is an excellent example of this, she tweeted us stating: "Thomas Cook offered coupons, so I requested for the money - no problem, the money's in my account.". Often it can be uncertain whether you meet the conditions to get compensation.
If you were on another flight anywhere else in the world, you might still have the ability to get your refund and payment, however you're at the grace of other sets of rules. Airline companies need to offer assistance such as food, telephone call and cottage (where there's an overnight delay) to travelers whose flight has been cancelled, regardless of exactly what caused the cancellation.
However your overall hold-up was, it would appear, compounded by what sounds like a technical fault on the 2nd plane (which would usually be accountable under EU261 topic to the length of the hold-up) and then a 3rd hold-up due to functional factors caused by traveler off packing which might be deemed likewise as 'extraordinary in some conditions) then you MAY have an argument right here.
If the airline company with whom you have a confirmed reservation becomes subject to an operating ban as above as an outcome of which Thomas Cook Airlines is not able to offer you an appropriate option, the provisions of "What if you make a change to or cancel my air travel prior to I take a trip?" above will use. Ryanair stated: Ryanair keeps in mind today's choice in the KLM case and will continue to adhere to the EU261 legislation.
Corina Van der Lans was a passenger on a KLM air travel from Equador to Amsterdam, which was delayed for 29 hours due to unforeseen technical problems in the form of 2 faulty parts. KLM dismissed Ms. Van der Lans' compensation claim, arguing that it might not be held responsible for technical issues that developed immediately flight delay compensation claims prior to take-off. Nevertheless, finding for Ms. Van der Lans, the ECJ ruled that unexpected technical problems can not be mentioned as a factor for rejecting payment. The compensation payments apply to flights leaving any EU airport or showing up in the EU with an EU carrier or one from Iceland, Norway or Switzerland.
If you don't believe an airline when it says the hold-up wasn't its fault, you can refer the problem to the UK's regulatory authority, the Civil Aeronautics Authority, another European regulatory authority or the European Customer Centre. Any of these can liaise with the airline company on your behalf to develop what caused the hold-up. However even then the CAA says it does not independently gather factors for an air travel hold-up and it will rely on airlines to describe what triggered a hold-up.
The level of payment depends on the length of your flight and the timings of the alternative air travel you are offered: You can just declare hold-up compensation if the ticket was a through ticket i.e. London to Philippines through Kuwait where you were connecting AND if the reaon for the delay was within the airline's control. A delay on the onward air travel if it was a stopever would only be elgigible for payment if the provider had been an EU one, as in this case you were not flying from an EU airport. The reason for the hold-up can be ascertained and after that your claim either paid or turned down.
If you were on another flight anywhere else in the world, you might still have the ability to get your refund and payment, however you're at the grace of other sets of rules. Airline companies need to offer assistance such as food, telephone call and cottage (where there's an overnight delay) to travelers whose flight has been cancelled, regardless of exactly what caused the cancellation.
However your overall hold-up was, it would appear, compounded by what sounds like a technical fault on the 2nd plane (which would usually be accountable under EU261 topic to the length of the hold-up) and then a 3rd hold-up due to functional factors caused by traveler off packing which might be deemed likewise as 'extraordinary in some conditions) then you MAY have an argument right here.
If the airline company with whom you have a confirmed reservation becomes subject to an operating ban as above as an outcome of which Thomas Cook Airlines is not able to offer you an appropriate option, the provisions of "What if you make a change to or cancel my air travel prior to I take a trip?" above will use. Ryanair stated: Ryanair keeps in mind today's choice in the KLM case and will continue to adhere to the EU261 legislation.
Corina Van der Lans was a passenger on a KLM air travel from Equador to Amsterdam, which was delayed for 29 hours due to unforeseen technical problems in the form of 2 faulty parts. KLM dismissed Ms. Van der Lans' compensation claim, arguing that it might not be held responsible for technical issues that developed immediately flight delay compensation claims prior to take-off. Nevertheless, finding for Ms. Van der Lans, the ECJ ruled that unexpected technical problems can not be mentioned as a factor for rejecting payment. The compensation payments apply to flights leaving any EU airport or showing up in the EU with an EU carrier or one from Iceland, Norway or Switzerland.
If you don't believe an airline when it says the hold-up wasn't its fault, you can refer the problem to the UK's regulatory authority, the Civil Aeronautics Authority, another European regulatory authority or the European Customer Centre. Any of these can liaise with the airline company on your behalf to develop what caused the hold-up. However even then the CAA says it does not independently gather factors for an air travel hold-up and it will rely on airlines to describe what triggered a hold-up.
The level of payment depends on the length of your flight and the timings of the alternative air travel you are offered: You can just declare hold-up compensation if the ticket was a through ticket i.e. London to Philippines through Kuwait where you were connecting AND if the reaon for the delay was within the airline's control. A delay on the onward air travel if it was a stopever would only be elgigible for payment if the provider had been an EU one, as in this case you were not flying from an EU airport. The reason for the hold-up can be ascertained and after that your claim either paid or turned down.