조회 수 4 추천 수 0 댓글 0
Getting compensation was a fight of wits, however after a court ruling today airline companies' excuses are running out. After being rescheduled onto a later flight which too was postponed by 90 minutes, we lastly arrived at Orlando at 1 clock in the morning, about 5 hours and 15 mins behind our original scheduled time. We finally came to Heathrow over 20 hours later than scheduled with our air travel from Miami to Heathrow (rearranged by means of British Airways) likewise postponed by 23 minutes. As a result of the hold-up getting home, we incurred additional expenditures for food and extra airport parking charges. You are appropriate that as American Airlines is not an EU based airline company you can just consider EU261 guidelines for the outward air travel.
A 3rd aircraft was then dispatched however it too was postponed as a number of travelers decided to desert their trips and the off-loading then triggered additional hold-up. This type of delay though is not daily and it is most likely a grey location to be reasonable when it concerns the. legislation. I have actually also learnt the actual EU legislation and can not see where this knock on hold-up is covered. However remember that the original fault is clearly NOT covered for compensation under the rules.
The level of payment depends upon the length of your flight and the timings of the alternative flight you are offered: You can just declare delay payment if the ticket was a through ticket i.e. London to Philippines through Kuwait where you were connecting AND if the reaon for the hold-up was within the airline's control. A delay on the onward flight if it was a stopever would just be elgigible for compensation if the carrier had been an EU one, as in this case you were not flying from an EU airport. The reason for the hold-up can be established and then your claim either paid or turned down.
I was questioning if I can make a claim for an air travel with Thomas Cook that was delayed for over 22 hours on the 25th of July 2009 due to a technical problem the air travel was from Glasgow to Sanford Orlando. You can use for payment if the hold-up was due to situations that are not classed as remarkable as the air travel departed from an EU airport as soon as you understand how long. Sadly, you can just claim compensation under the EU261 guidelines within a six-year time frame. Frustratingly for you, this time has only simply passed however your airline is no longer bound to pay you compensation.
I would suggest calling Norwegian Airlines once again to ask them more details about your delay and why they are classifying it as extraordinary scenarios - and keep records of your correspondence with the airline company in case you need to refer back to it at a later date. Then you would have been entitled to payment subject to pleasing the conditions, if this had been a Thomson aircraft. Unfortunately you would not be entitled to compensation under EU261 rul; es in this instance. The only strategy you might now have is to whine direct to KLM/Delta (they are partner airlines)and request for payment for the disruption.
My air travel to Vietnam last June was postponed by 8 hours due to 'technical factors' i gotten in touch with vietnam airline companies and have been provided a settlement of $200US per individual. Our BA air travel from Venice to Heathrow was postponed by 60 minutes leading to our missing our linking air travel to Newcastle. Welfare plans do not impact your rights to compensation however I 'd need to. know a couple of more information about your hold-up before I can encourage you.
However Emirates suggest that the EC261/2004 regs only use to the very first leg of my journey, which would not be a payment occasion as the hold-up was below 3 hrs. However, my analysis from reading your view on other cases is that payment is payable for the delay flight delay eu compensation at the last destination, in my case Brisbane, which was 24 hrs. They reference the judgments from lawsuit Emirates Airlines - Diretion fuer Deutschland v Dieter Schenkel (C-173/ 07) and Sanghvi v Cathay Pacific Airways to underpin their argument that the regulation only applies to individual air travels.
A 3rd aircraft was then dispatched however it too was postponed as a number of travelers decided to desert their trips and the off-loading then triggered additional hold-up. This type of delay though is not daily and it is most likely a grey location to be reasonable when it concerns the. legislation. I have actually also learnt the actual EU legislation and can not see where this knock on hold-up is covered. However remember that the original fault is clearly NOT covered for compensation under the rules.
The level of payment depends upon the length of your flight and the timings of the alternative flight you are offered: You can just declare delay payment if the ticket was a through ticket i.e. London to Philippines through Kuwait where you were connecting AND if the reaon for the hold-up was within the airline's control. A delay on the onward flight if it was a stopever would just be elgigible for compensation if the carrier had been an EU one, as in this case you were not flying from an EU airport. The reason for the hold-up can be established and then your claim either paid or turned down.
I was questioning if I can make a claim for an air travel with Thomas Cook that was delayed for over 22 hours on the 25th of July 2009 due to a technical problem the air travel was from Glasgow to Sanford Orlando. You can use for payment if the hold-up was due to situations that are not classed as remarkable as the air travel departed from an EU airport as soon as you understand how long. Sadly, you can just claim compensation under the EU261 guidelines within a six-year time frame. Frustratingly for you, this time has only simply passed however your airline is no longer bound to pay you compensation.
I would suggest calling Norwegian Airlines once again to ask them more details about your delay and why they are classifying it as extraordinary scenarios - and keep records of your correspondence with the airline company in case you need to refer back to it at a later date. Then you would have been entitled to payment subject to pleasing the conditions, if this had been a Thomson aircraft. Unfortunately you would not be entitled to compensation under EU261 rul; es in this instance. The only strategy you might now have is to whine direct to KLM/Delta (they are partner airlines)and request for payment for the disruption.
My air travel to Vietnam last June was postponed by 8 hours due to 'technical factors' i gotten in touch with vietnam airline companies and have been provided a settlement of $200US per individual. Our BA air travel from Venice to Heathrow was postponed by 60 minutes leading to our missing our linking air travel to Newcastle. Welfare plans do not impact your rights to compensation however I 'd need to. know a couple of more information about your hold-up before I can encourage you.
However Emirates suggest that the EC261/2004 regs only use to the very first leg of my journey, which would not be a payment occasion as the hold-up was below 3 hrs. However, my analysis from reading your view on other cases is that payment is payable for the delay flight delay eu compensation at the last destination, in my case Brisbane, which was 24 hrs. They reference the judgments from lawsuit Emirates Airlines - Diretion fuer Deutschland v Dieter Schenkel (C-173/ 07) and Sanghvi v Cathay Pacific Airways to underpin their argument that the regulation only applies to individual air travels.